For transfer-pricing consultancy firms

Comparables screening, without the website grind.

TP Scout finds, proves and describes the website of every company on your benchmarking list. Your team makes the call.

An example list of seven companies, each given a match grade in turn: six accepted with grades from A+ to C, and one rejected because the only site found was a directory.

Every row gets the same screen. Illustrative companies.

Three days by hand, one hour with TP Scout.

A 30-second film without voice. Checking 16 companies by hand takes three days of tabs, searches and screenshots. TP Scout verifies every website in one place, backs each fact with a screenshot, and the three days become one hour.

30 seconds, no sound needed. Illustrative companies.

Five jobs per company, done the same way every time.

By hand With TP Scout
Search for the company's website Checks the site in your export first, then searches only if it has to
Decide whether the site really belongs to it Looks for the tax ID, the registered address and the name on the site itself
Screenshot the pages you relied on Captures up to 20 activity pages per accepted company
Write down what the company does Writes a summary of up to four sentences, in any of 43 languages
Note why a company was dropped Writes down the rule that rejected it, and photographs the listed site when there is one

What happens to each company on your list

  1. Starts from your BvD export

    Load the Orbis file you already pull. TP Scout reads the usual BvD column names from a sheet called Companies.

  2. Proves whose website it is

    A tax ID or address found on the site settles it. A match on the name alone is the weakest proof, kept as a last resort.

  3. Keeps the proof

    Every verdict carries a grade from A+ to F, and every accepted company keeps the pages it was judged on.

  4. Hands the decision back

    Your analyst can swap a website, edit a summary or re-run a company, then export to Excel with a ZIP of the screenshots.

The TP Scout project view: a company list with match grades, validated websites, and generated activity summaries
The project view: one row per company, with its grade, its website and what it does.

Capacity, without dropping the standard

Run the same list twice in the same few days and you get the same verdicts. The method stops drifting with the person applying it.

A file a reviewer can check

Each accepted company sits next to the pages it was judged on, and each rejection carries its reason, so the reasoning survives the handover.

More studies, same team

The repetitive lookups move off your analysts' desks. Their hours go to the judgement calls.

Bring a list you have already screened.

We run it on the call. You judge the verdicts against your own.

Book a demo